Le dimanche 05 octobre 2008 à 20:26 +0200, Marco Chiappero a écrit : > > Le vendredi 03 octobre 2008 à 18:32 +0200, Marco Chiappero a écrit : > > > >> Is there any setting I can try to change to make Ekiga work with such > >> addresses? As soon as possibile I'll try a local NAT 1:1 as a > > workaround. > > > > There is nothing we can tell from the output. There is no call attempt > > or no registration attempt either...
[...] > Today I gave a try to ekiga placing a NAT 1:1 between my computer and my > ISP NAT. However no video or audio calls working, it definitely not an > IP number issue. Is the stun server working properly? Maybe a wrong Yes, it is working properly. > routing is causing this problem? > Here is the output: > http://pastebin.com/m1b3c0d3a > > Please give me a hint, I can't understand why it doesn't work. This debug output does not contain a call attempt, so it is impossible to tell what's going wrong. Where there is a call attempt, you must see an INVITE SIP request in the log. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\ Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ Be IP : http://www.beip.be/ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ ekiga-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
