This presentation on symmetric traversal via port prediction and hole punching states 9 router combinations were tested. 3 were symmetric routers. One combination of routers worked 80% of the time and all the rest worked 100%. http://www.hermitagesolutions.com/download/Outbound%20Datasheet.pdf
Christopher Priest [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- On Fri, 11/28/08, Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] symmetric nat traversal > To: "Ekiga mailing list" <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, November 28, 2008, 3:48 PM > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:40:24PM +0100, yannick wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teredo_tunneling#Limitations > > > > Well, according to wikipedia, it seems toredo has the > same limitations > > as Ekiga currently has... > > > There is an extension to the protocoll which supports > symmetric NAT > traversal. "Synteredo" or so, there was an IEEE > paper about that. > The miredo website claims support for symmetric NAT > traversal: > > > 19th August 2007 - Miredo 1.1.0 > This is a test release with initial symmetric NAT > traversal support, > and various other minor enhancements and fixes. Note that > it might not > work too well on non-Linux systems - BSD support will be > fixed later as > the 1.1.x branch matures. > > > > Regards, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > ekiga-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list _______________________________________________ ekiga-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
