Le jeudi 11 décembre 2008 à 22:55 +0100, Palo S. a écrit : > > > > Not sure how to fix Kamailio > > It may be possible for Kamailio developers to > identify place (in the code) where Kamailio > sends this CANCEL by itself and fix... > > > but I wonder if the CANCEL is not taken > > into account when it should not be. > > I think that Ekiga does it correctly, at least > I can\'t see why should it not take it into > account. If there is a safe way to distinguish > between \"correct\" and \"incorrect\" CANCEL then > of course, however I don\'t know how that could > be done
Some of the CANCEL's (due to forking) should have been ignored and they were not. A fix has been put into the stable branch and into TRUNK. Is that something you can test ? -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\ Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ Be IP : http://www.beip.be/ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:[email protected] _______________________________________________ ekiga-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
