Le samedi 20 décembre 2008 à 14:07 -0500, Andre Robatino a écrit : > Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le samedi 20 décembre 2008 à 10:28 -0500, Andre Robatino a écrit : > >> Damien Sandras wrote: > >>> Le jeudi 18 décembre 2008 à 14:50 -0500, Andre Robatino a écrit : > >>>> Attached is output.txt when my father attempts to call me. We are both > >>>> using Fedora 10 with ekiga-3.0.1-4.fc10 from the Fedora repo. We have > >>>> identical PCs, USB headsets, and webcams. He has a symmetric NAT > >>>> router, and I have a port restricted NAT router. The call drops after a > >>>> few seconds without audio or video ever being established. Each of us > >>>> can make normal echo test calls. > >>> > >>> With Symmetric NAT, it can not work. You really need to do something so > >>> that it is not a Symmetric NAT. Perhaps port forwarding or something > >>> else. > >>> > >>> Are you also 100% sure your router does not support SIP ? > >> His router is a Motorola 2210-02-1006 which is what AT&T is providing > >> now for new DSL customers. With Ekiga 2.0.12, it was initially detected > >> as a symmetric NAT router, and he could call me, but I couldn't reach > >> him. After putting in the port triggering rule, it was detected as a > >> port restricted NAT router, and we could connect in both directions. > >> Now, with Ekiga 3, we can't communicate in either direction (except for > >> a brief connection without audio or video when he calls me). Nothing > >> has changed except for Fedora 9 -> 10 and Ekiga 2 -> 3. > > > > The reason is the symmetric NAT. However, I do not understand why the > > NAT did not appear as symmetric with Ekiga 2.00. The STUN code did not > > really change between 2.00 and 3.00 :( > > It DID initially appear as symmetric NAT with Ekiga 2 (according to > Ekiga 2's Configuration Druid). Then, after setting up port triggering > in the router according to > > http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga_behind_a_NAT_router#Symmetric_NAT:_Dynamic_navigation_of_NAT_routers > > the Configuration Druid saw it as a port restricted NAT router. This is > exactly the behavior described at > > http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga_behind_a_NAT_router#SIP_only > > so the behavior with Ekiga 2 is as expected, it's the behavior with > Ekiga 3 that is confusing.
I understand, however, I do not understand why Ekiga 3 would do that. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\ Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ Be IP : http://www.beip.be/ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:[email protected] _______________________________________________ ekiga-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
