Le vendredi 23 janvier 2009 à 10:12 +0000, Nigel Dallard a écrit : > > You should fix your routing table so that only things > > for the VPN, reach the VPN. > > To the best of my knowledge, there is nothing wrong with my routing > table, which is reproduced below. 192.168.30.8 is the VPN interface and > 192.168.7.5 is the ethernet interface. Only traffic to the 192.168.20.0 > and 192.168.30.0 networks is routed via the VPN, everythingh else goes > via the ethernet. > > The traffic from ekiga appears to be correctly routed in terms of the > destination, but incorrectly formed as far as the source IP address is > concerned. To my mind, a packet with the source IP address of > 192.168.7.5 should not be sent via the VPN interface, as the destination > will be unable to reply, but that is exactly what ekiga does.
Except that the destination replies in your case, so from Ekiga's point of view, it is correct. If the destination did not reply, then then other address would be registered. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\ Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ Be IP : http://www.beip.be/ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:[email protected] _______________________________________________ ekiga-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
