2009/2/18 michel memeteau <[email protected]> > Hi > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Epelde Gorka <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I was thinking in using bonjour, since I'm thinking to deploy Ekiga with >> my platform and i'm not going to have access to the router in all scenarios. >> So port forwarding or sipproxyd is not a good solution for me. >> > > I m not sure I understood this : you think about Bonjour as a tool for Nat > traversal ? >
No. I'm thinking in a scenario where I would have clients different clients behind a NAT, but not limited to NAT clients. In http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga_behind_a_NAT_router#I_have_2_Ekiga_behind_a_NAT_using_STUN:_they_can.27t_communicateit proposes two solutions to be able to correctly communicate clients behind a NAT. In my case, zeroconf in their corresponding implementations (avahi, bonjour) would be the best option, since the second option of using SIPProxyd needs access to the router/firewall (as far as i understand) and I might not have access to the router in all scenarios. Do you have any build of Ekiga Win32 3.0.2 working with bonjour? > > Bonjour is made to detact other SIp clients inside the Nat, it can't do > anything about the outside world. > Yes that's how I understand Bonjour. > > _______________________________________________ > ekiga-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list >
_______________________________________________ ekiga-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
