Damien Sandras wrote:
[cut]
Indeed. I have submitted a temporary patch to
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572953. Not tested, but
should be better than today. If it not makes other problems
visible...Many thanks for your help with his, I wouldn't really have a
chance without it.
This patch will break with some hardware, even on Linux.
Yes.
OTOH, having a 5 periods hardcoded value for all hardware means, on 8
kHz, 100 ms latency where a value of 40-60 ms would be sufficient for
many (most?) hw configurations. I still regard this as a bug, although
this patch, which is more like a test case, is to simple. Stay tuned
until there is some testing...
Besides, things like this should definitely be declared instead of being
hardcoded values in implementation code :-)
--a
_______________________________________________
ekiga-list mailing list
ekiga-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
