kapetr wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:08:00 +1100
From: mat101 <[email protected]>
To: Ekiga mailing list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga on Ubuntu using DSL
302G D-Link modem
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Thanks for the response Rob.
kapetr also suggested that I try an iptel.org sip account
with twinkle -
it works well. The server-side STUN service of iptel.org
may be the
important factor that allows DSL modems to conduct
a voip interaction.
I'll try using the same sip account with Ekiga when
time allows. Thanks
for the advice.
Cheers.
Hello,
The working of twinkle is NOT due to iptel workaround. Twinkle works
without problems with ANY account I have try, even with ekiga account.
The reason is simple - in twinkle is STUN support not buggy :-)
So I have NOT to make some port forwarding, ...
It just works, why twinkle send to the communication partner proper public
(from outside accesable) pair IP/PORT resolved by STUN request/replay.
Thats all.
If ekiga would do the same, as it should, it wold be working too.
See my report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ekiga/+bug/517580
Check the wireshark output - see SDP in INVITE packet !
Ekiga works with only (really ONLY) iptel account and only when calling
something on iptel. To make call somewhere else is (of course) not possible.
BTW - the workaround by iptel I have described in previous post.
I have spend many hours in studying wireshark and twinkle logs, and I
99,999% sure, I'm right: Ekiga can't work behind comon ((port)restricted)
NAT.
--kapetr
_______________________________________________
ekiga-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
Thanks kapetr. Points duly noted.
_______________________________________________
ekiga-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
