On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:32:27PM +0200, Genghis Khan wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, 15 May 2013 14:07:45 +0200 > Víctor M. Jáquez L. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 01:55:45PM +0200, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > Bad news. > > > > > > That probably means GNOME has now less or no interest in Ekiga > > > anymore. > > > > Yes, though, it is a fact that we are not keeping the pace of gnome, > > with it's library dependencies and user interface design. > > What exactly is missing or wrong in Ekiga?
There's nothing missing or wrong in Ekiga per se. But if we want to think in Ekiga as a component of GNOME (3.x) we shall admit that Ekiga doesn't follow the UI design and the migration to GTK+ 3.x, GSettings, GStreamer, etc., is a bit lagged behind. vmjl > > It seems that many are satisfied with the many improved performances of > Ekiga in recent year, and is constantly being updated in repositories > such as Slackware and Salix OS. > > http://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.0/network/ekiga/ > > > vmjl > > _______________________________________________ ekiga-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
