While browsing for this issue, i came across a comment from spinscale  @
https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/2922
It says here, that after creating an index, it takes some time for index to
be fully functional, what i am facing as i think, is that if the node gets
killed during that time, then the index gets corrupted and indexing stops
with UnavailableShardsException being thrown.
is there some setting so that i can make sure that index creation call gets
returned only after that index is fully functional ? that would solve my
problem, as the index if created would be fully functional , if not then
the code will go again to create the index again.


On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Tarang Dawer <[email protected]>wrote:

> Tried one again, this time, the status showed 3 successful shards, but
> however the indexing got stuck,  and after a while an exception was thrown
>
> Caused by: org.elasticsearch.action.UnavailableShardsException:
> [indexName][4] [2] shardIt, [0] active : Timeout waiting for [1m], request:
> index {[indexName][indexName][ID], source["Record":"Details"]}
>     at
> org.elasticsearch.action.support.replication.TransportShardReplicationOperationAction$AsyncShardOperationAction.raiseTimeoutFailure(TransportShardReplicationOperationAction.java:548)
>     at
> org.elasticsearch.action.support.replication.TransportShardReplicationOperationAction$AsyncShardOperationAction$3.onTimeout(TransportShardReplicationOperationAction.java:538)
>     at
> org.elasticsearch.cluster.service.InternalClusterService$NotifyTimeout.run(InternalClusterService.java:483)
>     ... 3 more
>
> and the cluster state is still in red, with elasticsearch not able to
> recover the shards after the restart
>
> Conquer Lordcluster health: red (1, 3)
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Tarang Dawer <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> tried this on 90.9 also . This time after the restart when i get the
>> index status as :-
>>
>> In the elasticsearch head plugin, it shows the cluster is in red state,
>> with no shards being allocated to the node even after the restart of
>> elasticsearch.
>>
>> http://localhost:9200/indexName/_status
>>
>> {"ok":true,"_shards":{"total":10,"successful":0,"failed":0},"indices":{}}
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> In the elasticsearch head plugin, it shows the cluster is in red state, with 
>> no shards being allocated to the node even
>> after the restart of elasticsearch.
>>
>> Squirrel Girlcluster health: red (1, 0)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Tarang Dawer <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> i have reliably recreated this many times, happens while creating index
>>> on a single node, (default 5 shards). i have set
>>> "action.auto_create_index: false" , "discovery.zen.ping.multicast.enabled:
>>> false" & "node.master=true" so i am creating indices via java API, . i
>>> kill(Kill -9 ) the elasticsearch immediately after the index is created.
>>> when i restart the elasticsearch, out of the 5 primary shards, it shows 3/4
>>> shards in a corrupt state, with "503" status code.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Alexander Reelsen <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> can you reliably recreate this? And try to create a gist? Preferrably,
>>>> when using elasticsearch 0.90.9. When you create an index, you usually
>>>> create 5 shards, so, how can 3/4 shards be corrupt? Did you change anything
>>>> and do not use the defaults (are you changing the defaults somewhere else
>>>> as well)? It would be great if you could provide a reproducible example
>>>> using a gist, like mentioned in http://www.elasticsearch.org/help
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Tarang Dawer 
>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all
>>>>> I am facing an issue of corrupt index creation, whenever the es node
>>>>> is killed just after the index is created. When the node is restarted, the
>>>>> index shows 3/4 shards corrupt, with 503 status, which never recover, and
>>>>> as a result, my indexing gets stuck. I am doing this on a single node, 
>>>>> with
>>>>> es version 90.1 . Please help me out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Tarang Dawer
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAEGWFQVihK%3DzJ9wE%2BzufhOSoOHg97g-FM6FFnqtw8JCpYO4VCQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> .
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAGCwEM-ggGZXBRj_LwNc0ksEg-dcRDTZ-bKH_9AqJmOLi9A4UQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAEGWFQU9uPamQhXbZpkV%3DKvDVSJZziiEwpfDoAc%3DJqNuhA8xyQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to