You probably won't see any difference the first time you execute it unless you are using warmers. With a second query, you should see the difference.
How many documents you have in your dataset? -- David Pilato | Technical Advocate | Elasticsearch.com @dadoonet | @elasticsearchfr Le 9 janvier 2014 at 06:14:06, Arjit Gupta ([email protected]) a écrit: Hi, I had implemented ES search query for all our use cases but when i came to know that some of our use cases can be solved by filters I implemented that but I dont see any gain (in response time) in filters. My search queries are 1. Filter { "size" : 100, "query" : { "match_all" : { } }, "filter" : { "bool" : { "must" : { "term" : { "color" : "red" } } } }, "version" : true } 2. Query { "size" : 100, "query" : { "bool" : { "must" : { "match" : { "color" : { "query" : "red", "type" : "boolean", "operator" : "AND" } } } } }, "version" : true } By default the term query should be cached but I dont see a performance gain. Do i need to change some parameter also ? I am using ES 0.90.1 and with 16Gb of heap space given to ES. Thanks, Arjit -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/326a6640-d887-46b4-a8e7-ec15a1c9dc98%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/etPan.52ce519b.75c6c33a.1449b%40MacBook-Air-de-David.local. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
