I didn't manage to reproduce the issue locally either. What JVM / OS are you using (RC1 introduced Unsafe to perform String comparisons in terms aggs so I'm wondering if that could be related to your issue)?
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Nils Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: > I did only test it with 1 and with 10 shards, indeed with 1 shard it did > not have any issues, with 10 shards it has issues all the time. > I also had a colleague testing it with the two scripts in the gist (which > uses 10 shards). > > Also I do not think the analyzer _should_ have impact, since it would only > index more terms on that field if it tokenizes it. Can you use the > aggsbug.load.sh to load the data? And than use aggsbug.test.sh to run the > test? It should give you a field analyzed with the default analyzer and 10 > shards. > > I'll try out some different analyzers, and loading the data in 3 shards > now to see if that changes things. > > On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 4:02:54 PM UTC+1, Jörg Prante wrote: >> >> Also the same with shards = 3 and analyzer = standard. Stable results. >> >> { >> "took" : 240, >> "timed_out" : false, >> "_shards" : { >> "total" : 3, >> "successful" : 3, >> "failed" : 0 >> }, >> "hits" : { >> "total" : 1060387, >> "max_score" : 0.0, >> "hits" : [ ] >> }, >> "aggregations" : { >> "a" : { >> "buckets" : [ { >> "key" : "totaltrafficbos", >> "doc_count" : 3599 >> }, { >> "key" : "mai93thm", >> "doc_count" : 2517 >> }, { >> "key" : "mai90thm", >> "doc_count" : 2207 >> }, { >> "key" : "mai95thm", >> "doc_count" : 2207 >> }, { >> "key" : "totaltrafficnyc", >> "doc_count" : 1660 >> }, { >> "key" : "confessions", >> "doc_count" : 1534 >> }, { >> "key" : "incidentreports", >> "doc_count" : 1468 >> }, { >> "key" : "nji80thm", >> "doc_count" : 1180 >> }, { >> "key" : "pai76thm", >> "doc_count" : 1142 >> }, { >> "key" : "txi35thm", >> "doc_count" : 379 >> } ] >> } >> } >> } >> >> You should examine your log files if your ES cluster was able to process >> all the docs correctly while indexing or searching, maybe you encountered >> OOMs or other subtle issues. >> >> Jörg >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/7c74c649-8a4a-46c5-aaec-b6f3254cc0d9%40googlegroups.com > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Adrien Grand -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAL6Z4j6D_96Bs9kt5dnQ5MgpUCp%3DxELWyH%2BqinCv8uqPuWtq%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
