Interesting fact is that your stacktraces point to a Lucene 3.x field RAM size estimator method, which might have some yet not identified issues. This indicates to me that you still have an index originating from an early ES version (<0.90?)
If possible, I recommend to reindex data with 1.0.0.RC2, to benefit from a fresh built Lucene 4.6.1 index. Jörg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAKdsXoHt7%2BL4khCySG7A%2BpjHQ%3DJLLmQ3wq8LQOSrrstx5dj%3DiQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
