As of the time of this posting:

elasticsearch-0.90.9-1
jdk-1.7.0_51

ES_HEAP_SIZE=12g
ES_DIRECT_SIZE=20g
index.number_of_replicas: 1

Shards:
  "number_of_nodes" : 2,
  "number_of_data_nodes" : 2,
  "active_primary_shards" : 30,
  "active_shards" : 60,

And rather than a block of text, here are the current indexes:

<https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-oHwKVsVYhJ4/UvpaSWCWPUI/AAAAAAAABjg/Dn3Mz3VNAMk/s1600/es.png>


On Monday, February 10, 2014 3:08:22 PM UTC-8, Mark Walkom wrote:
>
> What's the total amount of indexed data (gb and count)? What about your 
> heap size, shard count, replica count, ES and java versions?
>
> Regards,
> Mark Walkom
>
> Infrastructure Engineer
> Campaign Monitor
> email: [email protected] <javascript:>
> web: www.campaignmonitor.com
>  
>
> On 11 February 2014 10:03, Harry Truman <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> I recently finished deploying an ES/Logstash cluster for a small 
>> environment. It's a two-node local cluster but I'm getting horrible 
>> performance and frequent crashes. I'll soon be standing up a cluster in 
>> another environment that's roughly 10x the size of this first one so I've 
>> got to figure out how to better optimize the clusters. Here's the current 
>> resource and indexing stats: 
>> 8 CPU, 64GB RAM, 1TB storage
>> 140 log sources, 21 indexed fields, ~35,000 message per minute, ~60GB/day
>>
>> At present, index/search performance is awful. If I search for any time 
>> period that's larger than a day or so, ES will usually crash and require a 
>> manual restart. I'm going to be standing up a second dedicated ES system 
>> and I'll be configuring one host for indexing and the second for searching. 
>> I'll also be enabling the mmapfs store, disabling the *_all* field, and 
>> disabling storing and/or indexing on some of the fields. At least that's my 
>> plan so far -- it makes sense in my head but I'm not sure if it will 
>> actually be the most efficient solution.
>>
>> If I'm doing something stupid or if anybody has other recommendations, do 
>> tell!
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "elasticsearch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/e12e8578-d32a-4e1b-b74d-b1e0073dfa14%40googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/11498c9b-2c21-491d-a571-a64a76d3954a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to