txs. binh. I have a new concern now, though, which is if, in the light of the blog post you mentioned, I should wrap my only "missing" filter inside a "bool" filter.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Binh Ly <[email protected]> wrote: > I wouldn't worry too much about this. Once the filter is cached, they should > all behave about the same. What should matter to you is if the filter is > cached or not. This should give you an idea of how to decide what filters to > use: > > http://www.elasticsearch.org/blog/all-about-elasticsearch-filter-bitsets/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elasticsearch/rZRGyK1Od8I/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/930df8cc-c955-44e2-b4bb-fd6f75603b76%40googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- uh, oh. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAKNaH0X7fJgJdnzs3M3zQ%2Bg9wRHkLq4k%2B2cBA4RgBGfMQk%2By4w%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
