Martijn,

I'm using Oracle Java 7u45

On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 1:05:13 AM UTC-8, Martijn v Groningen wrote:
>
> I see that you a lot of time is spend on just measuring how memory the 
> query takes in memory and not parsing the query. I think this slowness 
> might be jvm version dependent, what jvm version are you using?
>
>
> On 4 March 2014 01:33, James Bathgate <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Martijn,
>>
>> 1. Not running low at all.
>> 2. A regular document takes ~75ms.
>> 3. https://gist.github.com/julesbravo/9337810
>>
>> It looks like it's definitely CPU bound.
>>
>>
>> On Monday, March 3, 2014 3:40:05 PM UTC-8, Martijn v Groningen wrote:
>>
>>> On top of just indexing a document, the top level 'query' field part 
>>> gets parsed into a internal Lucene query. However I don't see why this 
>>> should take a long time.
>>>
>>> Some questions:
>>> Are you running low on jvm memory?
>>> How long does it take to index a regular document?
>>> Can you run the hot threads api while indexing a percolator document?
>>>
>>> Martijn 
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4 March 2014 00:25, James Bathgate <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What are the likely bottlenecks on indexing percolators? This is on a 
>>>> Vagrant virtual machine with 2 GBs of RAM with 1GB for ES. I'm wondering 
>>>> if 
>>>> this won't be a problem on an EC2 instance.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, March 3, 2014 2:14:34 PM UTC-8, James Bathgate wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think so. This is on my local dev with nothing else running on 
>>>>> the index.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, March 3, 2014 2:00:53 PM UTC-8, Binh Ly wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmmmm not sure, I just tried this on ES 1.0.1 and Oracle Java 1.7_u51 
>>>>>> and here are my results:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Insert Percolator:
>>>>>> {"_index":"merchandising","_type":".percolator","_id":"1","_
>>>>>> version":1,"created":true}
>>>>>> real    0m0.103s
>>>>>> user    0m0.015s
>>>>>> sys     0m0.000s
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it possible that your index was just busy?
>>>>>>
>>>>>  -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>>> msgid/elasticsearch/5dc16213-ba8e-4d68-9518-0882bd26e294%
>>>> 40googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Met vriendelijke groet,
>>>
>>> Martijn van Groningen 
>>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
> Martijn van Groningen 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/606b8eff-5085-4970-b10e-17590c19c12b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to