Righto - I will try add some.
-Nick

On Wednesday, 5 March 2014 13:48:58 UTC, Jörg Prante wrote:
>
> Yes, there are no tests yet.
>
> Jörg
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:24 PM, mooky <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> I am ready to create a pull request - its actually quite a simple change.
>> However, I cant find *any *tests for the existing BigDecimal support ... 
>> does that sound right?
>>
>> -Nick
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, 28 February 2014 12:09:00 UTC, mooky wrote:
>>>
>>> XContentBuilder has support for BigDecimal, but:
>>>
>>>    1. If you pass the source as a Map when indexing, the BigDecimal 
>>>    handling doesn't get invoked (https://github.com/
>>>    
>>> elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/5260<https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/5260>
>>>    ).
>>>    2. The existing handling should delegate through to Jackson's 
>>>    handling of BigDecimal (which can be configured to serialise BigDecimal 
>>> in 
>>>    a lossless fashion - I dont think that feature existed when I had to 
>>> worry 
>>>    about it last) 
>>>
>>> Looking at the code now, I think its actually an easy change - I will 
>>> see if I can create a pull request.
>>>
>>> -Nick
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 17:28:29 UTC, Jörg Prante wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ES accepts BigDecimal input. You can specify scale and rounding mode to 
>>>> format the BigDecimal. 
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/jprante/elasticsearch/commit/
>>>> 8ef8cd149b867e3e45bc3055dfd6da80e4e9c7ec
>>>>
>>>> Internally, BigDecimal is automatically converted to a JSON string if 
>>>> the number does not fit into double format. Because numbers are useful in 
>>>> Lucene for range searches, they have an advantage.
>>>>
>>>> But I agree, another option could be to enforce string conversion in 
>>>> any case, for example storing currency values as strings for financial 
>>>> services, without arithmetic operations in the index.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the toEngineeringString() was not a smart decision and 
>>>> toPlainString() works better.
>>>>
>>>> So I would welcome improvements, or should I suggest one in a pull 
>>>> request?
>>>>
>>>> Jörg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:05 PM, mooky <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In financial services space, we almost never use float/double in our 
>>>>> domain - we always use BigDecimal.
>>>>>
>>>>> In elastic, I would like to be able to index/store BigDecimal in a 
>>>>> lossless manner (ie what I get back from _source has the same precision, 
>>>>> etc as what I put in).
>>>>>
>>>>> When I have had to preserve the json serialisation of BigDecimal, I 
>>>>> have usually had custom serialiser/deserialisers that printed it out as a 
>>>>> json number - but whose textual value was toPlainString(). When 
>>>>> deserialising, creating the BigDecimal with the string value (e.g. 
>>>>> '42.5400') maintained the precision that was originally serialised
>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>
>>>>> {
>>>>>   verySmallNumber : 0.00000000012000,
>>>>>   otherNumber : 42.5400
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps elastic could index bigdecimal as a double - but store it in 
>>>>> the source in a lossless fashion.
>>>>> It would require a user setting, I guess, to treat all floating point 
>>>>> numbers as BigDecimal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>>>> msgid/elasticsearch/b54dfd5a-3a0e-4946-aa5f-28b3794a92ac%
>>>>> 40googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "elasticsearch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/b8463a21-c997-4269-ae52-992caae88ced%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/b8463a21-c997-4269-ae52-992caae88ced%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/d56144d1-3e0d-46d2-9ff8-a2cadc9b8344%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to