According to the graph, the fielddata_breaker_estimated_size increase is linked to our data inserts. Since you weren't able to reproduce the issue by inserting given data, either the data set is not enough varied or the issue is due to queries done prior the inserts. For the 1st case, I could probably give you some snapeshots from our data. For the 2nd, I could give you more details about our queries.
Le mercredi 26 mars 2014 22:39:35 UTC+1, Lee Hinman a écrit : > > On 3/24/14, 7:46 AM, Dunaeth wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here's a small sample of data (atm, the march index is near 6M docs for > > 1.37GB size). > > I haven't been able to reproduce the issue locally, but Simon noticed > that this may be caused by > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5553 , which is fixed in > the upcoming 4.7.1 release (which will be incorporated into ES shortly > after). > > ;; Lee > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c1d05b77-d66c-427c-a59a-519208547a2a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
