Hi Mark, thanks again for helping with this.
I'm wondering why, in the solution, the mapping doesn't include the data node in the tree. In fact when I explicitly state the data node as a property of contestant, the aggregations come back blank.Gist: https://gist.github.com/dazraf/9957039 many thanks! On Wednesday, 2 April 2014 18:31:29 UTC+1, Mark Harwood wrote: > > A rough Gist here that sums OK with one level of nesting: > https://gist.github.com/markharwood/9938890 > > > > On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 5:13:22 PM UTC+1, dazraf wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I've also experimented with nested types using dynamic templates. >> Interesting (empty!) aggregation results! >> Gist: https://gist.github.com/dazraf/9937198 >> >> Would be grateful if anyone can shed some light on this please? >> >> Thank you. >> >> On Wednesday, 2 April 2014 16:05:00 UTC+1, dazraf wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Gist: https://gist.github.com/dazraf/9935814 >>> >>> Basically, I'd like to be able to aggregate a field of an array of >>> observations, grouped by an ancestor/parent id. >>> So for example (see gist): Aggregate the timings per contestant across a >>> set of contests. >>> >>> I realise that the data can be structured differently - effectively >>> flattened to a document per contest-contestant-contest. >>> However, I don't have the luxury of doing this in the real-world case. >>> >>> Any help much appreciated. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/084cea14-2cc1-4b94-9218-e87f5cba6bdf%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
