Data can be corrupted irrespective of its store. What's probably more important is the processes and procedures around writing and reading the data.
But, being able to easily increase and scale replication is definitely a positive. Regards, Mark Walkom Infrastructure Engineer Campaign Monitor email: [email protected] web: www.campaignmonitor.com On 4 April 2014 02:34, Anand Somani <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > If I have data (that needs indexing) that I cannot lose, would it > advisable to store it only in Elastic Search as the source of truth with 3 > copies (2 replicas) ? Reading a little about index corruption and such, my > gut feeling is no, but I was wondering if people had any experience with > it. > > Thanks > Anand > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CANN9sNrVjG70inBwQZrq%2BXQOMivERE8eZekOD-6Co3RJDE8v5A%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CANN9sNrVjG70inBwQZrq%2BXQOMivERE8eZekOD-6Co3RJDE8v5A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAEM624Z_x9CVN2GRtiVWxhUNcQFs%2Bi%3DovHM5kJbOq-dRJsFS1A%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
