A match_all query or a constant score query would be equivalent. -- Ivan
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 10:31 PM, slushi <[email protected]> wrote: > I am executing search requests with a sort defined. In this case, from a > performance perspective is it better to do a match_all query and then add > the query as a filter or is it basically equivalent? Should I wrap the > query in a constant score query to avoid any scoring overhead? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/2a211811-4f3a-427b-bf0a-ffd32e9697bd%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/2a211811-4f3a-427b-bf0a-ffd32e9697bd%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQC5LM10--NYy7XSRNxRqTcYhSpUvRptbD%2BWe8FbkJBbaA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
