Yes, it is (not only) relevant to library catalog indexing, because
Bibframe, a new project by Library of Congress, is built on RDF, and
next-generation library systems will embrace W3C semantic web technologies.

The RDF data I generate is indexed in JSON-LD format into Elasticsearch but
for SPARQL queries, it has to be stored in triple stores. SPARQL is one
missing thing I can not do with Elasticsearch, just querying JSON-LD, which
is good for a number of use cases, but not for "pure" semantic web
applications.

Projects like Jena Text try to connect RDF and Lucene/Solr
http://jena.apache.org/documentation/query/text-query.html by other means,
by adding "full text searches" as a language property into a SPARQL dialect.

But I wonder if a SPARQL engine could run a subset of SPARQL on a JSON-LD
doc store like Elasticsearch, by translating SPARQL to ES DSL queries. Some
queries won't run that fast, but that wouldn't hurt for a demonstration - I
admit the idea is a very rough sketch, but replacing triple store by ES
would be intriguing.

Comments, ideas, criticism etc. is welcome.

Jörg



On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Jakub Kotowski <[email protected]>wrote:

> It took quite a bit of figuring out but we succeeded registering a
> rootMapper and using the ParseContext, thanks.
>
> We don't have any plans for implementing SPARQL on top of ElasticSearch.
> Siren can do joins which  perform better than blockjoins, especially for
> deep nesting, but it still is a different paradigm.
>
> On the other hand, we are always interested in new use cases. We've done
> work on indexing richly structured documents with lots of structure and
> lots of text content too and querying where you need to combine querying
> structure and text. Maybe that is something relevant to library catalog
> indexing?
>
> In any case, I'd be happy to hear more if you want to reply offline.
>
> Jakub
>
>
> On Friday, May 23, 2014 8:00:51 PM UTC+1, Jörg Prante wrote:
>
>> Do you plan to implement SPARQL endpoint on Elasticsearch?
>>
>> That would be one wonderful asset missing in my portfolio for supporting
>> library catalog indexing and search, all I do with RDF and Elasticsearch is
>> based on JSON-LD.
>>
>> Jörg
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Jakub Kotowski <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Great, the ParseContext looks promising.
>>>
>>> We'll try it and report back, thanks!
>>>
>>> Jakub
>>>
>>> BTW, just to answer your previous implicit question - SIREn allows for
>>> advanced structured document search, more at http://sirendb.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "elasticsearch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/e4168857-a854-4119-abae-58d4cbbbaf1a%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/e4168857-a854-4119-abae-58d4cbbbaf1a%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAKdsXoEd0zSuN0WHy3a2U5Dwx6atGnhuWwmjq9pwDBKdG2z70A%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to