You mean that you want to snapshot your data to S3 and then expose your SNAPSHOT on http, right?
I think, but I might be wrong that in that case, using a fs repository to read your http SNAPSHOT (even if it had been build with S3) should work. But may be I misunderstood your case here??? I hope this help -- David Pilato | Technical Advocate | Elasticsearch.com @dadoonet | @elasticsearchfr Le 19 juin 2014 à 17:32:17, JoeZ99 ([email protected]) a écrit: the "url" type is used in combination with the "fs" type. some machines can write/read snapshots to a "fs" type repository, and same machines can only read for a "url" repository which points to the same location the "fs" repository points at. Is this behavior by any chance possible using S3 repositories??? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/30022b27-3fa2-4fb3-9e2f-2d5b86523425%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/etPan.53a32176.6b8b4567.198d%40MacBook-Air-de-David.local. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
