You'll get the best performance from SSDs (obviously), but ES compresses data natively so you won't get much out of doing the same on the FS level.
Regards, Mark Walkom Infrastructure Engineer Campaign Monitor email: [email protected] web: www.campaignmonitor.com On 23 June 2014 22:45, Prashant Agrawal <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > We are using ES for indexing bulk data which may go in terms of TB. > So just looking for which file system would be more suitable in terms of > efficiency, performance, indexing time , searching time out of EXT4 , XFS > or > ZFS? > > ~Prashant > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://elasticsearch-users.115913.n3.nabble.com/Storage-type-in-Elasticsearch-tp4058250.html > Sent from the ElasticSearch Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/1403527528571-4058250.post%40n3.nabble.com > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAEM624Y9%2BP2DduQxRXbxkoJ3QnvdgDm3iv%2B8MTDWT4CZkZsVHQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
