> > Disabling sharding shouldn't make any significant difference > thanks!
> > It would demand some work to isolate these queries. However, I managed > > to find out the reason why the query last much longer: the number of > > queried fields increased from 9 (solr) to 25 (es). I thought this had > > no impact: the number of tokens in the index got not changed but is > > now more distributed in different fields. In other words: it turned > > out that the number of fields you query has a greater impact on > > performance than the number of tokens stored in a indexed field. So I > > know what to do and try union fields where possible. Thanks for your > help! > > > To me this means that the documents that are indexed in solr and Es are > different. Is this correct? > they are identical, but in the newer elasticsearch version the edgengrams and the raw tokens are stored in separate field, which allows boosting entire words. we are using the fields <https://github.com/christophlingg/photon/blob/komoot/es_config/mappings.json#L47> feature for that. > Would you mind sharing the schema of the document you are indexing in > Solr and ES ? We may be able to provide tips / ideas to improve search > performance > sure! https://github.com/christophlingg/photon/blob/603c3991f19c969a7c80d601cabd9367136ca809/es_config/mappings.json https://github.com/komoot/photon/blob/deprecated-solr-version/solrconfig/collection1/conf/schema.xml Cheers! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/4c059fc5-a33c-46a1-9f92-688798c9710e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
