Hi, I submit an issue few days ago about this : https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/6866.
Le jeudi 17 juillet 2014 14:44:29 UTC+2, Elliott Bradshaw a écrit : > > I realize that this post is getting a little old, but does the community > have any feedback on the feasibility of this? > > On Friday, May 16, 2014 10:21:53 AM UTC-4, Tom wrote: >> >> +1 fuzziness would be great when using cross_fields >> >> Am Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2014 22:00:25 UTC+2 schrieb Ryan Tanner: >>> >>> Any update to this? >>> >>> On Monday, April 7, 2014 7:59:54 AM UTC-6, Elliott Bradshaw wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Elasticsearch, >>>> >>>> I've been playing with the new cross_fields multi match type, and I've >>>> got to say that I love it. It's a great way to search complex data >>>> without >>>> doing a lot of memory killing denormalization. That said, is there any >>>> plan to implement a fuzziness option with this type? That would certainly >>>> be very valuable. >>>> >>>> - Elliott >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/abe1f33a-554a-4588-9e69-7d74d6329486%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
