Hi Horst, I wouldn't bother with this for the reasons Joerg mentioned, but should you try it anyway, I'd love to hear your findings/observations.
Otis -- Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 6:56:36 AM UTC-4, horst knete wrote: > > Hey Guys, > > to save a lot of hard disk space, we are going to use an compression file > system, which allows us transparent compression for the es-indices. (It > seems like es-indices are very good compressable, got up to 65% > compression-rate in some tests). > > Currently the indices are laying at a ext4-Linux Filesystem which > unfortunately dont have the transparent compression ability. > > Anyone of you got experience with compression file systems like BTRFS or > ZFS/OpenZFS and can tell us if this led to big performance losses? > > Thanks for responding > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/a92ce201-a228-407d-a9d4-613125488454%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
