Very little as you have found. But you might find aggregating will take a fair bit of resources.
Regards, Mark Walkom Infrastructure Engineer Campaign Monitor email: ma...@campaignmonitor.com web: www.campaignmonitor.com On 21 August 2014 18:34, 'Sandeep Ramesh Khanzode' via elasticsearch < elasticsearch@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Hi, > > What is the difference in performance or additional load on ElasticSearch > if I define an index with 50 shards or I define 50 indices with one shard. > > I mean, technically, there are blogs that suggest that these are > equivalent? Of course without the shard rebalancing, replica, failover, etc. > > But, performance-wise, if I am to do 50 indices with one shard, and > aggregate results from all 50, will I see a degradation in performance > compared to 1 index with 50 shards? > > Thanks, > Sandeep > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/e3c4bba7-6de8-41af-9022-12ea31cef63a%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/e3c4bba7-6de8-41af-9022-12ea31cef63a%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAEM624YrUojVadJHEDWRuyCggzq_5zKn1P8R5gc-7qi-0JEY3Q%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
