Hi ,

Analyzer are used either way. Just that score is not computed for filters.
Also there are some permanence optimizations using caching in filters -
http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/en/elasticsearch/guide/current/filter-caching.html
Try that too.


Thanks
          Vineeth


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:48 PM, André Hänsel <[email protected]> wrote:

> I thought I need a query (instead of a filter) to use the analyzer. How
> can I do this? Sorry, I'm rather new to Elasticsearch.
>
> Also, is that the best way to go for this kind of query?
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 6:13:15 PM UTC+2, vineeth mohan wrote:
>
>> Hello ,
>>
>> If you use filters rather than query , the scoring should be out of
>> picture.
>>
>> Thanks
>>            Vineeth
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, André Hänsel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I have an index with about a million entries with a rather dynamic
>>> structure. The queries I want to perform are of the kind: "give me exactly
>>> the entries that contain '*abc*' and '*def*' in any two fields". The
>>> results can be returned in an arbitrary order.
>>>
>>> Since I still need the analyzer for accent and case folding and the
>>> like, the query I end up with is:
>>> {
>>> "query": {
>>>  "match": {
>>> "_all": {
>>> "query": "abc def",
>>>  "operator": "and"
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> I have the exact same dataset in Sphinx with min_infix_length = 3 (the
>>> Sphinx equivalent of "min_gram: 3") and on my development machine no query
>>> takes longer than 100 ms (in Sphinx).
>>>
>>> I haven't even activated the ngrams in Elasticsearch yet and it already
>>> takes more than 500 ms to search for a new set of terms.
>>>
>>> Now I wonder if this rather bad performance is related to the scoring
>>> that is performed and what I can do to make it (much) better. Can I maybe
>>> turn off the scoring (since I don't care about the order at all) and get
>>> better performance by that?
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>> msgid/elasticsearch/ed6690b3-0116-46ef-bdb2-649c2d3e50e2%
>>> 40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/ed6690b3-0116-46ef-bdb2-649c2d3e50e2%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "elasticsearch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/908c48c1-13a4-4a61-9759-d5228b06c086%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/908c48c1-13a4-4a61-9759-d5228b06c086%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAGdPd5kYMRGK8-U8MS2C5mQVJtZ5Pd-GE2pZK_RdCa3-6pGxxA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to