We also use it in dev for months across various ES and Java 8 releases, I
have been considering rolling it out to a smaller prod cluster as well as
we've had no problems at all.

Regards,
Mark Walkom

Infrastructure Engineer
Campaign Monitor
email: [email protected]
web: www.campaignmonitor.com


On 11 September 2014 21:30, [email protected] <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Nice to see another success of G1 GC :)
>
> Jörg
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Robert Gardam <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, we are seeing much better gc performance here too!
>>
>> We were experiencing the stop the world GC with CMS and then nodes would
>> time out.
>>
>> Our heap is 32gb, we run two nodes per system. IO doesn't seem to be an
>> issue here.
>> 20 nodes = 10 boxes, 128gb ram each
>>
>> Field cache is limited to 20%
>> We're bulk indexing around 10k events/s
>>
>> It seems to be much more stable and predictable in terms of GC. The GC
>> Logs are showing a huge reductions
>>
>> 61043,866: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0140156 seconds
>> 61044,524: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0005284 seconds
>> 61045,801: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0006138 seconds
>> 61045,802: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0003635 seconds
>> 61045,802: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0002545 seconds
>> 61045,803: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0002944 seconds
>> 61045,804: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0002367 seconds
>> 61046,469: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004653 seconds
>> 61048,172: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004850 seconds
>> 61048,598: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004937 seconds
>> 61049,197: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004396 seconds
>> 61050,264: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004587 seconds
>> 61051,593: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004600 seconds
>> 61051,689: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0005021 seconds
>> 61053,822: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004721 seconds
>> 61053,824: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0005323 seconds
>> 61053,825: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0003403 seconds
>> 61053,825: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0003301 seconds
>> 61053,826: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0003322 seconds
>> 61053,826: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0003364 seconds
>> 61059,265: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004321 seconds
>> 61061,691: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004619 seconds
>> 61062,595: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004529 seconds
>> 61064,199: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004587 seconds
>> 61070,267: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004606 seconds
>> 61074,200: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004508 seconds
>> 61076,693: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004709 seconds
>> 61077,597: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004698 seconds
>> 61079,268: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004601 seconds
>> 61079,817: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004535 seconds
>> 61081,818: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004979 seconds
>> 61082,819: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004817 seconds
>> 61089,204: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0011584 seconds
>> 61091,699: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004501 seconds
>> 61092,599: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004539 seconds
>> 61094,204: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0006452 seconds
>> 61095,271: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0006568 seconds
>> 61101,701: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004679 seconds
>> 61102,601: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004576 seconds
>> 61104,272: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004474 seconds
>> 61114,207: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0005483 seconds
>> 61115,273: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004848 seconds
>> 61117,604: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0008780 seconds
>> 61117,703: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0005068 seconds
>> 61124,274: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004519 seconds
>> 61127,605: Total time for which application threads were stopped:
>> 0,0004786 seconds
>> 61129,249: [GC pause (G1 Evacuation Pause) (young)
>> Desired survivor size 1291845632 bytes, new threshold 15 (max 15)
>> - age   1:   19633616 bytes,   19633616 total
>> - age   2:    3428232 bytes,   23061848 total
>> - age   3:    1362152 bytes,   24424000 total
>> - age   4:    1443728 bytes,   25867728 total
>> - age   5:     996840 bytes,   26864568 total
>> - age   6:    1584400 bytes,   28448968 total
>> - age   7:    1697168 bytes,   30146136 total
>> - age   8:     578056 bytes,   30724192 total
>> - age   9:    1166056 bytes,   31890248 total
>> - age  10:       8904 bytes,   31899152 total
>> - age  11:      31640 bytes,   31930792 total
>> - age  12:     979168 bytes,   32909960 total
>> - age  13:     108016 bytes,   33017976 total
>> - age  14:      15376 bytes,   33033352 total
>> - age  15:     755696 bytes,   33789048 total
>> , 0,0134055 secs]
>>    [Parallel Time: 8,0 ms, GC Workers: 10]
>>       [GC Worker Start (ms): Min: 61129248,9, Avg: 61129249,0, Max:
>> 61129249,0, Diff: 0,1]
>>       [Ext Root Scanning (ms): Min: 0,4, Avg: 0,7, Max: 2,0, Diff: 1,6,
>> Sum: 7,4]
>>       [Update RS (ms): Min: 0,0, Avg: 0,9, Max: 1,3, Diff: 1,3, Sum: 8,7]
>>          [Processed Buffers: Min: 0, Avg: 14,6, Max: 38, Diff: 38, Sum:
>> 146]
>>       [Scan RS (ms): Min: 0,1, Avg: 0,4, Max: 0,6, Diff: 0,5, Sum: 3,9]
>>       [Code Root Scanning (ms): Min: 0,0, Avg: 0,0, Max: 0,0, Diff: 0,0,
>> Sum: 0,2]
>>       [Object Copy (ms): Min: 5,7, Avg: 5,7, Max: 5,8, Diff: 0,1, Sum:
>> 57,5]
>>       [Termination (ms): Min: 0,0, Avg: 0,1, Max: 0,1, Diff: 0,1, Sum:
>> 0,7]
>>       [GC Worker Other (ms): Min: 0,0, Avg: 0,0, Max: 0,0, Diff: 0,0,
>> Sum: 0,2]
>>       [GC Worker Total (ms): Min: 7,8, Avg: 7,9, Max: 7,9, Diff: 0,1,
>> Sum: 78,6]
>>       [GC Worker End (ms): Min: 61129256,8, Avg: 61129256,8, Max:
>> 61129256,9, Diff: 0,0]
>>    [Code Root Fixup: 0,1 ms]
>>    [Code Root Migration: 0,2 ms]
>>    [Clear CT: 2,0 ms]
>>    [Other: 3,1 ms]
>>       [Choose CSet: 0,0 ms]
>>       [Ref Proc: 1,6 ms]
>>       [Ref Enq: 0,1 ms]
>>       [Free CSet: 1,3 ms]
>>    [Eden: 19,1G(19,1G)->0,0B(19,1G) Survivors: 64,0M->80,0M Heap:
>> 25,3G(32,0G)->6337,0M(32,0G)]
>>  [Times: user=0,10 sys=0,01, real=0,01 secs]
>>
>> I unfortunately don't have the gc logs from when we were using cms, only
>> entries in the es logs.
>>
>> [gc][old][420117][9522] duration [46.2s], collections [2]/[47s], total
>> [46.2s]/[16.8m], memory [31.6gb]->[30.3gb]/[31.9gb], all_pools {[young]
>> [490.1mb]->[56.6mb]/[665.6mb]}{[survivor] [83.1mb]->[0b]/[83.1mb]}{[old]
>> [31gb]->[30.3gb]/[31.1gb]}
>>
>> and this never reclaimed as much space as it does now.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 9:16 AM, [email protected] <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Java 8 / G1GC works well here, what issues do you have?
>>>
>>> Jörg
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Robert Gardam <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I had been hitting my head up against heap issues until this afternoon
>>>> after enabling G1GC.
>>>>
>>>> What are the known issues with this type of GC?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/5e158da0-fd01-4dd1-8483-cf2671c675b2%40googlegroups.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/5e158da0-fd01-4dd1-8483-cf2671c675b2%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elasticsearch/6gum8WWaqsM/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAKdsXoGBvjnVve4V1gbzuULR%2BYtb4OD3AgukxfX1q_6wDg%3DOYg%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAKdsXoGBvjnVve4V1gbzuULR%2BYtb4OD3AgukxfX1q_6wDg%3DOYg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "elasticsearch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAN%3D%2BWfpUvHnv71Wzh33KjejQmuPdr8md90Jn_OMTGdMeAeZ4YQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAN%3D%2BWfpUvHnv71Wzh33KjejQmuPdr8md90Jn_OMTGdMeAeZ4YQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "elasticsearch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAKdsXoGxG57ysggU%3DUfXhHz7eCgHR0cwhDpEwz7y29sQyMX3Lw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAKdsXoGxG57ysggU%3DUfXhHz7eCgHR0cwhDpEwz7y29sQyMX3Lw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAEM624Z7HRbjv%2B1K2e%2BfLtd2jAVY_WKB0pAULAsC0fjyZ6c9XQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to