So a match Query and a Range filter?
I'm not sure I understand. May be you could try to GIST a script and show what
you have tried so far?
As you are starting with elasticsearch, I don't want to over complicate things,
but you will probably need at some point to use nested documents.
At this moment, I'd suggest to index documents per rate. So:
PUT index/type/1
{
"name": "Hotel Radisson",
"rates": {
"from": "2014-01-01",
"to": "2014-02-02",
"price": 100
}
}
PUT index/type/2
{
"name": "Hotel Radisson",
"rates": {
"from": "2014-01-01",
"to": "2014-02-02",
"price": 150
}
}
--
David Pilato | Technical Advocate | elasticsearch.com
[email protected]
@dadoonet | @elasticsearchfr | @scrutmydocs
Le 24 septembre 2014 à 09:39:06, Rifat Nabi ([email protected]) a écrit:
Sorry that I couldn't explain properly. Let me try again.
So, when I search with the term "Radisson" and a date range. I want to filter
the name with that term and then filter the rates with the date range. After
that do some calculation with those filtered rates. Which will produce
something like the following.
[
{
"name": "Hotel Radisson"
"rate": 80
}
]
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 1:31:37 PM UTC+6, David Pilato wrote:
I did not understand what you are trying to produce.
May be you could paste here what kind of output you are expecting?
--
David Pilato | Technical Advocate | elasticsearch.com
[email protected]
@dadoonet | @elasticsearchfr | @scrutmydocs
Le 24 septembre 2014 à 09:19:26, Rifat Nabi ([email protected]) a écrit:
Anyone? :(
On Sunday, September 21, 2014 9:17:26 PM UTC+6, Rifat Nabi wrote:
Hi
I'm very new to elasticsearch and was trying to find an efficient way to solve
the following problem.
Lets say I have the following data structure-
{
"name": "Hotel Radisson",
"rates": [
{
"from": "2014-01-01",
"to": "2014-02-02",
"price": 100
},
{
"from": "2014-01-01",
"to": "2014-02-02",
"price": 150
},
...
]
}
Now, I want to do a range query on the rates and calculate a rate using the
resulted data from the result. And, use that rate as facet.
I was thinking of trying with aggregation. But, is it the correct way to do it?
will it be efficient? Or there's a better way to do it.
Thanks in advance.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/3b6452c6-724c-4612-b6d0-a5f607274dac%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/62d14c1a-c0db-404c-85a3-d9794e028b9a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/etPan.54227670.66ef438d.3194%40MacBook-Air-de-David.local.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
