Hi Anantha, yes, that sounds reasonable to me. In that case you have two longs, and if you filter by day, you can save resources for sorting within the day.
Jörg On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Anantha Govindarajan < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jörg, Sorry > I intended to say for HHmmssSSS field . How much memory will es take when I > apply sorting or aggregations on HHmmssSSS field . In this case number of > unique values for HHmmssSSS field can be 86400000(~80.6 million. > Note : We are creating daily indexes . If user searches > on multiple dates (for example last 7 days ) , then I will sort by both > yyyyMMdd & HHmmssSSS. If user searches for single day (for example today ) > the I will apply sorting on HHmmssSSS field alone . > > > >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> -- >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAEX_wjpbFT-efdyXGbaOpPyV-dAR%3Df%3Dw0%3DEy6c5C3nPjnPcn%2BA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAEX_wjpbFT-efdyXGbaOpPyV-dAR%3Df%3Dw0%3DEy6c5C3nPjnPcn%2BA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAKdsXoFm8D7TbapNxd%3DN1ZytcgxWsbDy0_Mn_buaZJQU78_JJw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
