Hi Matt, I don't understand what the problem is, can you maybe try to elaborate a bit?
Thanks. On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Matt Traynham <[email protected]> wrote: > Thoughts, anybody? I saw that you can somewhat do this with "scripts" and > letting the top aggregation encompass all term fields, but is that any more > performant? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c79e42a7-bd82-4aed-9e1d-4e882566f630%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c79e42a7-bd82-4aed-9e1d-4e882566f630%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Adrien Grand -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAL6Z4j65OMxJQkCxRBORW9V2%3Dy2wUNxDmbWiWKdJh_27qjsX1g%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
