I don't see how that's an issue. Data needs to be stored somewhere. If I'm hitting disk often, I'm going to do so no matter what, no matter where.
So why not have the data on all nodes? On Monday, November 17, 2014 12:11:15 PM UTC-8, Christopher Ambler wrote: > > Can someone explain to me why, if disk space is not an issue, I don't want > maximum replication such that every node has every shard? > > It seems to me that there would be no real downside here as long as I'm > not worried about filling up a disk and my updates happen infrequently and > in a timely manner. > > Am I missing the obvious? ;) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/6e54e3dc-c9f3-4428-977e-fc3f0e64da8d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
