Thanks Jakub, it's interesting.

For now I've solved the issue with the increasing the number of RELOCATING
shards:
[image: Inline image 1]

Looks like it helps.

Regards,

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Jakub Podeszwik <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I've seen similar behaviour when i've had checksum some errors.There may
> be some info in your logs about it. In that case shard fail to be assigned
> because elasticsearch couldn't verify checksum of one or more of its
> segments.
>
> On Tuesday, 18 November 2014 14:17:02 UTC+1, Pavel P wrote:
>
>> It looks, that I have 2 shards unassigned, because two other shards were
>> stuck in "RELOCATING" state.
>>
>>
>> <https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-TD84Uz8lg5Q/VGtGVXVIFVI/AAAAAAAAAK4/ITudefzX1qQ/s1600/ES_RELOCATING.png>
>>
>> And I think I have them migrating here and there, and while they are
>> trying to find the new home for themselves, it's not possible to allocate
>> those 2 shards.
>> I've tried to close the index and then open - when the index was closed -
>> all the remaining shards were allocated successfully, after I've opened it
>> again - no shards remain unassigned.
>>
>> So the current question is - why some shards are relocating constantly.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, November 17, 2014 11:02:43 AM UTC+2, Pavel P wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a cluster from 5 nodes, where I store the information from the
>>> logstash.
>>> Recently I've tried to increase the number of shards in the logstash
>>> index to 20 (from 5).
>>>
>>> From the beginning everything went well, all the shards were allocated
>>> and the cluster state was green.
>>>
>>> But, currently, when the new index is started (at the beginning of the
>>> day), I met the situation when some shards are not allocated:
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-R3bWkXbXCbU/VGmwngnPOzI/AAAAAAAAAKY/9n8XlVCGPyc/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2014-11-17%2Bat%2B10.23.04%2BAM.png>
>>>
>>> Nothing happens during the day, while I thing the cluster has resources.
>>>
>>> If I would restart some nodes from the cluster, it could turn out that
>>> all the shards would be allocated.
>>>
>>> The idea which I'm trying to reach - more shards => each shard is
>>> smaller => it would allocate them faster, it would index faster, because of
>>> the indexing on each shard.
>>>
>>> Questions:
>>>
>>> 1. Why it is not able to allocate those shards during the index creation?
>>> 2. Why it does not allocate those shards during the day?
>>> 3. What is the recommended shards number for N nodes?
>>>
>>> Any thoughts are welcome.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "elasticsearch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elasticsearch/q5Xkn9pc9EM/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c9ccce72-37ac-44d5-a016-ea8ef9a20e73%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c9ccce72-37ac-44d5-a016-ea8ef9a20e73%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 

*Pavel Polyakov*

Software Engineer - PHP

E-mail: [email protected]
Skype: pavel.polyakov.x1

<https://www.facebook.com/kreditech>
Kreditech Holding SSL GmbH
Am Sandtorkai 50, 20457 Hamburg, Germany
Office phone: +49 (0)40 - 605905-60
Authorized representatives: Sebastian Diemer, Alexander Graubner-Müller
Company registration: Hamburg HRB122027

www.kreditech.com
facebook.com/kreditech <https://www.facebook.com/kreditech>

<https://www.facebook.com/kreditech>

This e-mail contains confidential and/or legally protected information. If
you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this e-mail by
error please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized review, copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in
this e-mail is strictly forbidden. The contents of this e-mail is legally
binding only if it is confirmed by letter or fax. The sending of e-mails to
us does not have any period-protecting effect. Thank you for your
cooperation.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAFVUaqO9zccHa-EO0e_75_B9ZNDuF_RVCBkn9OLs0tK7_fxnig%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to