Refreshing is expensive, depending on number of updated docs / deleted docs. Why should it be fast? It is not necessarily all in memory, it may include file close/open operations.
Jörg On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Jinyuan Zhou <[email protected]> wrote: > I have average 220 milliseconds each refresh. It seems very slow. I > thought refresh should be very fast. It flush the buffer to lucent segment > and everything happens in memory. Does IO speed affect refresh speed? I do > have spinning disks. > Thanks, > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/e5c9f7f0-40a8-4684-881c-b4493b000f94%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/e5c9f7f0-40a8-4684-881c-b4493b000f94%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAKdsXoGOeN0VkF0AxgD85PFj3RoKYHJYhBzh0q2O0ERAujoSDQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
