May be you could do this one index at a time? David
> Le 12 déc. 2014 à 08:34, Stefan <[email protected]> a écrit : > > And what would be the best way to achive this? > > The things is that we don't have enought storage the generate a new index and > leave the old one as it is > > Am Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 17:28:52 UTC+1 schrieb Stefan: >> >> Hello again! >> >> I am having another problem with the ELK-Stack. >> >> I have now parsed a lot (100GB+) of logfiles into ES and now i saw that the >> timestamp from the logfile (the format is dd.MM.yyyy HH:mm:ss.SSS 11.12.2014 >> 17:27:15.178) but ES interpreted it as string. >> >> How can i solve this problem? >> With als low as effort as possible because indexing that much data would >> need a hell lot of time. >> >> Thanks! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elasticsearch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/498f0c4c-92fe-4ecc-82f5-7d360b20dd07%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/3FADB661-52FD-4979-ACEA-DF49B3C29EA3%40pilato.fr. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
