On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Eran Duchan <[email protected]> wrote: > Seems to me that an uncompressed binary representation ala protobuf would be > smaller than compressed JSON given our schema. > > If that were to prove correct, is it possibe to do this? I dont expect > ElasticSearch to do anything except allowing me to control the contents of > _source. >
The question is how much. for example in my tests it saves 2% with lz4 and 0.5% with deflate (the larger block size used there makes it super-not-worth-it). Its not worth the complexity IMO. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAMUKNZUMG4G6jF7Rw%3Dn9gMenQnm8nytnJ84WMW0K3CjTt%2Bc8TA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
