That's the minimum number. Is it recommended to have more, or will elections take longer if we have more than this minimum?
On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 at 2:16:27 PM UTC+5:30, drjz wrote: > > The formula is N/2+1, so in your case that would be 46 if there are 90 > nodes. > > /JZ > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 at 9:38:01 AM UTC+1, Darshat Shah wrote: >> >> Hi, >> What is the guideline on recommended number of master eligible nodes in a >> cluster? >> >> We have a big cluster with 90+ nodes, currently all are eligible to be >> masters. However I do see master election take very long after a cluster >> restart - most nodes are still trying to ping the old master and I think >> there is no way to force a re-election. >> >> Will re-election be faster if number of master eligible nodes be less? Is >> there a rule of thumb, given N nodes how many should we configure to be >> eligible to be masters? >> >> Thanks >> Darshat >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/c73fdcf8-e5c1-42ef-82f3-0e0d4f897cf0%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
