Greetings community,
I'm hoping to get some feedback on synonym rule formatting. I'll do my best
to explain using a pseudo example; please bear with me.
1. I have a specific use case where five documents contain the word
*J555*, and one document contains *J5-55*.
- both mean the same thing, but are indexed from two different
sources over which I have no control.
2. Users search for these documents using *J555*, *J5-55*, *J-5-55*,
and *J-555*
How do I create a mapping that will allow each of the cases listed in #2
result in, at the very least, the six documents referred to in #1? I
thought this would have been the following:
*J555*, *J5-55*, *J-5-55*, *J-555 => J555, J5-55*
But that doesn't work as expected. We have expand=true in our synonym
configuration. Do you have any thoughts? My main goal is simply to
understand better how the mappings work.
Sincerely,
Tyler
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/8d8f585b-3ad2-4041-9ba3-0268999c9b24%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
