I saw a similar thing happen yesterday, and the post then appeared today. It was not a new thread in this case but instead a reply. I blame Google.
On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 1:31:53 PM UTC-6, Mark Walkom wrote: > > I have had a look through the backend and cannot see these threads at all. > > On 12 March 2015 at 13:44, Gavin Seng <seng....@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> What is the current policy on this? >> >> I just tried creating 2 new posts ... they showed up for awhile ... and >> then disappeared. I thought that it could be because I did inline pictures >> ... so I tried reposting and got the same result. >> >> Not sure if they're in a "to be moderated" bucket ... or googles spam >> filter just deleted them. >> >> The posts had these subjects: >> * What is a reasonable number of evictions for filter_cache and fielddata? >> * Are long queues in management threadpool a problem? >> >> Thanks, >> Gavin >> >> On Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 4:56:54 AM UTC-5, nodexy wrote: >>> >>> The first post should be approved . >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, July 2, 2014 2:36:44 AM UTC+8, Clinton Gormley wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> Recently we've had a few spam emails that have made it through Google's >>>> filters, and there have been a calls for us to change to a >>>> moderate-first-post policy. I am reluctant to adopt this policy for the >>>> following reasons: >>>> >>>> We get about 30 new users every day from all over the world, many of >>>> whom are early in their learning phase and are quite stuck - they need >>>> help >>>> as soon as possible. Fortunately this list is very active and helpful. In >>>> contrast, we've only ever banned 34 users from the list for spamming. So >>>> making new users wait for timezones to swing their way feels like a heavy >>>> handed solution to a small problem. Yes, spammers are annoying but they >>>> are >>>> a small minority on this list. >>>> >>>> Instead, we have asked 10 of our long standing members to help us with >>>> banning spammers. This way we have Spam Guardians active around the >>>> globe, >>>> who only need to do something if a spammer raises their ugly head above >>>> the >>>> parapet. One or two spam emails may get through, but hopefully somebody >>>> will leap into action and stop their activity before it becomes too >>>> tiresome. >>>> >>>> This isn't an exclusive list. If you would like to be on it, feel free >>>> to email me. Note: I expect you to be a long standing and currently >>>> active >>>> member of this list to be included. >>>> >>>> If this solution doesn't solve the problem, then we can reconsider >>>> moderate-first-post, but we've managed to go 5 years without requiring it, >>>> and I'd prefer to keep things as easy as possible for new users. >>>> >>>> Clint >>>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "elasticsearch" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/3c9db9fa-4676-4413-b7e6-e309869a6643%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/3c9db9fa-4676-4413-b7e6-e309869a6643%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/f3647cf8-6aa3-405f-bae8-d0748dca61a4%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
