Hi Mark, may I ask what the reason for this recommendation is?
Thanks, Andrej Am Mittwoch, 18. März 2015 17:50:09 UTC+1 schrieb Mark Walkom: > > We recommend shards no larger than 50GB, but as you mention there is no > exact limit. > > On 18 March 2015 at 04:09, Georgi Ivanov <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> My rules is : 1 primary shard per server. >> >> Also make some estimation how big will be the single index/shard >> >> I think it is not good if single shard exceed 10 GB, although there is no >> exact limit. >> >> >> Georgi >> >> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 7:00:23 PM UTC+1, John S wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Is there any best practices of having on the number of shards for a >>> cluster? I have a 4 node cluster and used shards of 20. >>> >>> During any node failure or other events i doubts since the shards number >>> is high, replication to new node is taking more time... >>> >>> Is there any metrics or formula to be done for number or shards? >>> >>> Regards >>> John >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "elasticsearch" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/36ef3ed0-870f-41a5-915b-fb3ad919f7a0%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/36ef3ed0-870f-41a5-915b-fb3ad919f7a0%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/385c959b-0132-4d9d-95cd-b4b08fca9c94%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
