Hi everyone, Recently I use Splunk Enterprise for my company's need and I am new to Elasticsearch (and other open-source alternatives mentioned here). But I am also interested in this analysis (and focus group) about these two solutions. One of the first analysis I read in Web is from *riskfocus*, which is a Splunk partner, and here is the link about performance: http://riskfocus.com/splunk-vs-elk-part-1-cost/
I hope new topics will emerge from the article (and maybe critical views!). Look forward to hear more experiences with the two tools! Skender Kollcaku System Engineer Consoft Sistemi Milan, Italy On Friday, 18 April 2014 23:33:59 UTC+2, Frank Flynn wrote: > > We have a large Splunk instance. We load about 1.25 Tb of logs a day. We > have about 1,300 loaders (servers that collect and load logs - they may do > other things too). > > As I look at Elasticsearch / Logstash / Kibana does anyone know of a > performance comparison guide? Should I expect to run on very similar > hardware? More? or Less? > > Sure it depends on exactly what we're doing, the exact queries and the > frequency we'd run them but I'm trying to get any kind of idea before we > start. > > Are there any white papers or other documents about switching? It seems > an obvious choice but I can only find very little performance comparisons > (I did see that Elasticsearch just hired "the former VP of Products at > Splunk, Gaurav Gupta" - but there were few numbers in that article either). > > Thanks, > Frank > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elasticsearch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/aa7d38c6-2858-42d6-b419-63fb264a54cd%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
