I beg your pardon?
Before leaping to attack someone, perhaps you should consider whether
the inference you object to was intended by the author, or just the way
you read it?
I merely wished to state that in replying to Mike's post I wasn't
agreeing with his strong criticism of Elecraft in failing to deliver the
K2 Server. But since you want to pick an argument over it, I will now
add that he does have a point. On page 20 of my KIO2 manual it states:
"Using the K2REMOTE Control Program
K2REMOTE was developed by Elecraft to provide flexible remote control of
the K2, even over the Internet (using TCP/IP)."
I have been follwing Elecraft since the very first. My K2 S/N is 392,
and I ordered the KIO2 right when it was announced. It doesn't matter
what you say, K2 Server *was* originally promised.
However, if you had actually bothered to read my two postings on the
subject, I think you might have come the conclusion I was saying that
there are already enough ways to control the radio remotely that the
absence of K2 Server is not an issue.
I await your apology.
--
Julian, G4ILO (RSGB, ARRL)
G4ILO's Shack: http://www.tech-pro.net/g4ilo
"Charles Bland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm not going to enter into the argument over the ethics of promising
something and not delivering.
Then get over it and stop mentioning it.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
