Hi Geoff,

I'd add one more option/possibility: one suitable for
remote (at the antenna) mounting.
Keep the kit form option. It's a very easy build.
cheers,
Julius
n2wn

--- Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Julius,
> Thanks for the fill in. I still have not received
> the early postings hmmmm.
> Strange, I just sent Eric and Wayne a wish for the
> >KAT100 and that is for a
> "Silent" antenna coupler that does not require watts
> to be radiated during
> tune, but only a few milliwatts. It would provide
> "for free" a dummy load,
> not only for testing but also a "default" load for
> the TX when the antenna
> falls down. Like you I would much prefer a meter, I
> do not like the LEDs at
> all as a VSWR indicator to be honest. Fine for
> "status" indicators.Ability
> to bypass coupler, Yes.
> CU off list re antennas.
> 73,
> Geoff.
> GM4ESD
> 
> 
> 
> > 'ello Geoff,
> > We're discussing the "wish list" for an updated
> > KAT100, or modifying the current version. I show
> my
> > advanced decrepitude by waxing philosophically
> about
> > adding a power out/SWR METER. LEDs are fine, but I
> > just prefer a meter!
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [email protected]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply via email to