Go for the KRX3 this year and a P3 next 73 de M0XDF, K3 #174 (with KRX3), P3 #108 -- One glance at a book and you hear the voice of another person, perhaps someone dead for 1,000 years. To read is to voyage through time. -Carl Sagan, astronomer and writer (1934-1996)
On 13 Aug 2010, at 18:44, Bill Myers wrote: > > I need some advice about my next upgrade. My K3 (4380) does not have the > sub-Rx, which was my next planned addition. However, the P3 has attracted > my attention, and may be a better choice. > > The KRX3 seemed like a natural next step. I am a "casual" DXer and > contester, so it made sense to gain the features it would add, especially > for SPLIT operation. But the K3 really has a good split system without the > sub-RX - at least for my level of seriousness. > > When I consider the P3, it would seem that the ability to spot (visually) > and quickly (click?) the best frequency would be a powerful feature. My > problem; I have no experiience with either a sub-receiver, or a spectrum > display - my most advanced tranceiver before the K3 was my K2 (which will > continue to have a place on my operating table!). > > So, considering that I want to upgrade with only one or the other for now, > what is the expert advice? ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
