Yes, David. K2 is even more mechanically stronger than K3 and with internal battery. If 2m is needed, a 2m handheld + a small portable 20w linear will give you the power but much less standy current.
73 Johnny VR2XMC ----- 郵件原件 ---- 寄件人﹕ David Woolley (E.L) <[email protected]> 收件人﹕ Elecraft Reflector <[email protected]> 傳送日期﹕ 2010/8/29 (日) 10:46:40 PM 主題： Re: [Elecraft] Some thoughts on the K3 as an emergency communications station I would have thought the K2 was even better in some ways: - less than a third of the receive current requirements; - field repairable; - whilst not as tolerant of close in signals, it is still very tolerant, and a disaster scenario ought to be a cooperative environment (otherwise you have human, rather than engineering problems), unlike a contest. I'd suggest this was more an issue in regional or national control centres, where power and weight would be lesser issues. Wayne Burdick wrote: > I'm reflecting on how the K3 can > serve as a flexible station for emergency communications. > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
