They're called key clicks...nice to be able to SEE them now :>) 73, Guy.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Al Lorona <[email protected]> wrote: > Lyle, I have been noticing the same things. There are a lot of signals with > that > characteristic low frequency rise. And as low frequencies rise, > intelligibility > and punch fall. > > But not only phone signals... one can see -- at suitably narrow spans-- which > CW > signals take up more spectrum than others. Here, the P3's peak hold feature > helps to exaggerate the differences between signals. There are some CW signals > out there that are real spectrum hogs, thanks probably to the too-sharp > transitions on their keying waveforms. This defect is easily seen with the P3. > > Al W6LX > > > > > ________________________________ > > If you tune into these signals and listen to them, you will usually find > that the "flat spectrum" speech has more dominance but still has good > fidelity. > > 73, > > Lyle KK7P > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
