I agree a zillion percent with Stan.  The KX1 is a phenomenal radio, with a
sensitive receiver and solid transmitter.  I typically operate using a 12v
battery and a Buddipole, and making contacts is never a problem.  They're
also a load of fun to build!

Steve, KW4H

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:19 PM, stan levandowski <sjl...@optonline.net>wrote:

> ..so there I am, in the garage, late afternoon two days ago, with the
> newly homebrewed 20M mag loop sitting in an umbrella stand about 18
> inches off the concrete floor.  It was threatening to rain and I didn't
> want to put it outside.  Pretuned the loop with my antenna analyzer for
> the low end of 20M.  Now I need something to transmit with.
> Quick....run upstairs, grab the KX1 and a headset and run back down to
> the garage!
>
> There were 8 fresh "AA" batteries in the KX1 with 1.4 watts going out
> according to the KX1 display. 20M sounds open and pretty hot! Let's try.
> Standing in the garage, a few feet from the loop, with the KX1 in my
> left hand, I worked Illinois, Indiana, Guayama, P.R., and St.
> Petersburg, Russia (UA1CE)  from here in NY.
>
> ..and if the band wasn't "open" then I doubt that even a hundred watts
> would have been enough power.  With QRP, timing is everything, in my
> opinion and experience.
>
> Just my opinion, of course, but there are two radios that Elecraft
> should never mess with - the K2 that launched them and the KX1 which is
> the premier QRP ultra-portable.
>
> For those who may not be familiar with it, there is a SDR in Atlanta, GA
> - WB4MAK ( http://www.websdr.org/ ).  Log on and  "tune" the SDR to your
> transmitting frequency, plug a recorder into your computer's earphone
> jack, and record yourself calling "CQ" at 15 or 20 watts.  Then do it at
> 10 watts; then at 5 watts, etc.  You'll certainly notice a difference in
> signal strength but you might be surprised at how little that difference
> is.
>
> The KX1 - in my opinion - has just the right amount of compromise
> between form and feature.  If the KX1 were enhanced to higher power, a
> more powerful and longer lasting power source, and a few extra options
> such as noise blanker and upgraded filtering.......then it would
> approximate the K2 which already has 15 watts, options galore, and a
> hefty battery alternative.
>
> It seems like it would be a pretty weak business case to insert a
> product between the "barebones" KX1 and a "barefoot" K2.
>
> At least that's my opinion.
>
> Stan Levandowski WB2LQF
> HF QRP CW -- Doing more with less for over 50 years!
> QCWA #35038   OOTC #4558   NAQCC #4740   SKCC #6488   FISTS #14992
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to