I wondered when somebody would comment on that. It seems like it's at least a tie.
Larry N8LP On 12/5/2010 5:15 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:23:28 -0500 > From: "Joe Subich, W4TV"<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Fwd: New Sherwood report > To:[email protected] > Message-ID:<[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > Interesting ... why does Rob put the FT-5000 above the K3? > > 2 KHz IMDDR are the same (101 dB) ... FT-5000 filter ultimate > rejection is*poorer* than the K3, LO noise is*poorer* than > the K3, 100 KHz blocking is*poorer* than the K3. Sensitivity > and noise floor are comparable depending on which preamp is > active on each radio ... with no preamp the K3 has a lower > noise floor and greater sensitivity. > > Maybe I'm biased but I would still rate the K3 numero uno .. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
